Author: Uri Blass
Date: 13:43:40 02/12/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 12, 2006 at 16:40:08, George Tsavdaris wrote: >On February 12, 2006 at 15:58:18, Peter Skinner wrote: > >>>>On February 12, 2006 at 11:01:56, Torstein Hall wrote: >> >>>Simply because you know you are missing out on something good! >>> >>>The feeling of having the strongest engine on the market and knowing something >>>even stronger and better is just around the corner for free, is something I can >>>recommend! You should try it as well! :-) >> >>There is the difference between you and I. I don't need the best program >>running, I just need the one that _could_ be the best one running. > >The one that could be the best one running? What that is supposed to mean.....? >The most beautiful maybe? LOL! > > >> >>Hiarcs more than does that for me, and has done that for years. Same with >>Gandalf. Both are excellent programs, and the authors do NOT come here and >>breach the charter by flagrantly advertising or selling their program. > > I think you are overreacting and highly exaggerating on the whole matter! And >unfortunately your behaviour in this topic has made me change a bit my huge >positive opinion about you.... Telling me and 600 more people minions, is >completely ridiculous..... > >> >>Fruit did the same. I didn't buy it. Shredder did the same. I didn't buy it. > >How Fruit and Shredder did the same.....? Not that i actually believe Rybka did >something that i find against the charter -except the last post of Vasik about >future releases, where i agree it was against the charter. But except this >nothing more before.... I even disagree about it. I see an advertisement as posting the same information again and again. posting information about future releases of rybka is IMHO not an advertisment. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.