Author: Albert Silver
Date: 06:58:33 01/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 13, 2000 at 18:19:13, Thorsten Czub wrote:
>On January 13, 2000 at 15:47:13, Albert Silver wrote:
>
>>>The chess-forum is open for anybody to read, and
>>>if you want to post you need to sent an email
>>>to the admin to get username and password.
>>>than you can post too. So it is moderated.
>>>Of course you can post about other programs like
>>>CSTal
>
>
>>Only programs like CS Tal? What if I don't know of any programs like CS Tal? :-)
>
>my english is very weak. sorry. other programs than cstal of course.
>guess you know some :-)
Of course I realize that, and was just joking.
>
>>I don't know what to say. The forum appears dedicated to attacking CCC.
>
>no.
>chris attacks ccc. no wonder. he is banned from here.
>he has his opinion, i have mine.
>you don't have to read it.
That's not really the point. I'm not speaking of free speech here, but the
nature and purpose of the forum.
>
>>The
>>first thing one notices is the title: "The Intelligent Chess Forum"
>
>I remember david levy building a company called INTELLIGENT CHESS.
>so chris is again in davids steps ? .-)))
Plausible, but given the rest, I don't believe it. Maybe he should start a "I
hate CCC!" homepage. Now THAT would be productive!
>
>
>> which gives
>>a forehand taste of what follows. Sure enough, out of 13 threads, no less than 4
>>were initiated by Chris and directed directly against the CCC with titles as
>>follow:
>
>he is right, isn't he ?!
Right, wrong, that's irrelevant. Why would I want to hang out in a forum whose
purpose is to attack ANOTHER forum? I can hardly think of a bigger waste of my
time.
>
>>You get the picture. It is one of spite and bitterness, and all in all quite
>>sad.
>
>I see it different.
>
>
>> Terms such as "Fool's Forum" (no doubt in contrast to the 'Intelligent
>>Chess Forum'), "forces of darkness", etc... is what can be expected. It doesn't
>>speak very eloquently on the man's balance IMO.
>
>balance is e4 e5. later the position gets unbalanced.
>but that does not tell us who wins.
>or who was right playing f5
Wins?? Wins what? What could Chris possibly 'win' from this? CCC at it's worst
is innocuous, so we're not exactly talking about a fight against the Klu Klux
Klan here. I cannot imagine myself spending so much time stalking and attacking
people I do not like. Talk, discuss, reason if you like, but creating a forum
and then starting a number of threads on how bad the OTHER forum is? What utter
rubbish!
>
>> Why waste so much energy and
>>time on something that is supposedly regarded with such derision?
>
>???
>
>nonsense.
>
>> Was the
>>feeling of betrayal so deep? Make peace or move on Chris, but this? This is the
>>ex-boyfriend out to get 'even' with his ex-girlfriend no matter the cost.
>
>???
>and ?
>its straight.
>he is not wished here, so he makes his own-.
>thats a very normal human behaviour.
>remember captain kirk always NOT doing what star fleet told
>him, and spock+mc_coy/bones and scotty, always at his side.
>
>this is not a boyfriend story, or of ex, this is friendship. or ?
>or what is the reason mc_coy/bones /spock and kirk be together ?
Sorry, you lost me with all the Star Trek talk. I understood the part about
creating a place where he is eminently welcome, was that your point?
Albert Silver
Peace and love, Thorsten. :-)
>
>
>
>> What
>>next? Pamphlets? Magazines? TV spots denouncing the evil CCC? *Sigh*
>
>no - even more books by shatner of course. How captain kirk is doing it
>again. and spock ? he is vulcan. don't forget. he lives longer.
>maybe longer then you.
>
>Live long and prosper Albert.
>
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.