Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 07:17:58 01/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 14, 2000 at 09:58:33, Albert Silver wrote: >That's not really the point. I'm not speaking of free speech here, but the >nature and purpose of the forum. computerchess. say things other people would censor out. write about different approaches. different ideas. go different ways. not censor or ban people who have different strategies or don't want to follow the path of a fast-searcher. You will see "the sense" IMO later. its only the beginning. also see: he is doing shogi and go and backgammon and other stuff too. so whats wrong with this. in a few years chess/human is uninteresting because no human beeing anymore wins. than we all have to change to shogi or go. chris is only a few years earlier. we will still let the chess-programs fight each other. but . but we are crazy freaks. >Plausible, but given the rest, I don't believe it. Maybe he should start a "I >hate CCC!" homepage. Now THAT would be productive! i don't see chris as HATING or UNPRODUCTIVE. in fact he is very productive when he is in his manic mood. he often has sent me 2 versions a day. and they all played different and some where really good. this way CSTAL 2.03 has been made. so why do you see chris negatively only ? hm. strange. he inspires me often with his different point of views. >Right, wrong, that's irrelevant. Why would I want to hang out in a forum whose >purpose is to attack ANOTHER forum? I can hardly think of a bigger waste of my >time. nonsense. this forum has not the reason to attack other forums. thats nonsense. he is telling his opinion. thats ok. he can do so. its his forum. so he can do so. you maybe want to read the computerchess stuff. i am getting many requests for people who want to come in. so later maybe when more people post, there will be traffic too. who knows. >Wins?? Wins what? What could Chris possibly 'win' from this? CCC at it's worst >is innocuous, so we're not exactly talking about a fight against the Klu Klux >Klan here. I cannot imagine myself spending so much time stalking and attacking >people I do not like. he does other things. in fact. i know it. i do test this other things. believe me. he can produce more things in 5 minutes than you can write bullshit about. he has 6 children. how much do you have ? :-)) > Talk, discuss, reason if you like, but creating a forum >and then starting a number of threads on how bad the OTHER forum is? What utter >rubbish! whatever you want. i don't want to convince you. believe what you want to. as long as bill gates wants, this is a free world. > >> >>> Why waste so much energy and >>>time on something that is supposedly regarded with such derision? >> >>??? >> >>nonsense. >> >>> Was the >>>feeling of betrayal so deep? Make peace or move on Chris, but this? This is the >>>ex-boyfriend out to get 'even' with his ex-girlfriend no matter the cost. >> >>??? >>and ? >>its straight. >>he is not wished here, so he makes his own-. >>thats a very normal human behaviour. >>remember captain kirk always NOT doing what star fleet told >>him, and spock+mc_coy/bones and scotty, always at his side. >> >>this is not a boyfriend story, or of ex, this is friendship. or ? >>or what is the reason mc_coy/bones /spock and kirk be together ? > >Sorry, you lost me with all the Star Trek talk. I understood the part about >creating a place where he is eminently welcome, was that your point? > > Albert Silver > >Peace and love, Thorsten. :-) > >> >> >> >>> What >>>next? Pamphlets? Magazines? TV spots denouncing the evil CCC? *Sigh* >> >>no - even more books by shatner of course. How captain kirk is doing it >>again. and spock ? he is vulcan. don't forget. he lives longer. >>maybe longer then you. >> >>Live long and prosper Albert. >>
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.