Author: Chris Carson
Date: 18:21:53 01/25/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 25, 2000 at 20:56:21, Peter W. Gillgasch wrote: >On January 25, 2000 at 08:46:27, Chris Carson wrote: > >>Does anyone know what position(s) HSU used >>to get the 100M NPS (DB) or 200M NPS for >>DBII? > >Why do you think that the position matters >at all ? As long as he can keep the chips >busy the total number of cycles should be >constant. Since he was doing the last 4 plies >in hardware - and that means that he basically >did all the positions in hardware - I suspect >that the overhead onthe SP which certainly >depends on the position can be neglected... >Obvious, isn´t it ? > >-- Peter > >>Was it one position or many position's? Was it >>middle game, endgame, or combination? >> >>I would like to have the EPD for the >>position, it would be interesting to >>benchmark against. :) >> >>Thanks. >> >>Best Regards, >>Chris Carson OK, but that is not why I wanted the position. HSU quoted the numbers and I would like to know what positions were used. Best Regards, Chris Carson
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.