Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 09:02:29 02/01/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 01, 2000 at 01:01:33, Michael Cummings wrote:
>On February 01, 2000 at 00:45:41, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>On January 31, 2000 at 17:37:22, Dann Corbit wrote:
>>
>>>Why doesn't someone send a suggestion to the Chessmaster folks, asking them to
>>>include an autoplayer? (Or *better yet* Winboard capability)??
>>>
>>>It seems that lots of people would like to see it tested. Why burden the poor
>>>SSDF testers, when the existance of an autoplayer or Winboard compatibility
>>>would remove the problem?
>>
>>
>>Why do the same threads get repeated again and again each time a new SSDF list
>>is out, in almost the same words?
>>
>>It gets boring. :)
>>
>>Thanks, Michael Cummings.
>>
>>
>> Christophe
>
>Your Welcome Christophe :)
>
>I think they get repeated cause I see the power of the Chess Engine as being the
>ultimate. Johann is a master Chess programmer (if not the best :-)
>
>Until CM6K or sadly CM7K is tested and the results show that the others are
>better when using the faster hardware, I will keep on beating the King Engines
>drum :) BOOM BANG BOOM !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>:-)
>
>I will continue to fight for the equal rights of all computer chess programs, A
>fair system for all is what we all want in the end to find the best of the best.
>
>I must fight for TRUTH, JUSTICE & THE AUSTRALIAN WAY !!!!!
Your point about CM6000 is now completely outdated.
You should realize that the real number 1 is Chess Tiger 11.8. It tops the P90
list with a huge margin, other competitors are far behind.
Your CM6000 leads the P200MMX by only 1 point... Ridiculous!
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.