Author: Paulo Soares
Date: 21:48:39 05/21/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 21, 2000 at 19:37:58, Bruce Moreland wrote: >On May 21, 2000 at 19:05:58, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>You are missing my point. Within 5 years, a single microprocessor chip is going >>to have more than one cpu. There are already prototypes. Several vendors have >>done this already, although none that are "PC" aware... >> >>But a dual or quad cpu chip is coming. Quicker than you might think. And it >>will still be able to run in a palm or whatever, if the computational demands >>continue to increase.. > >I think multiprocessor machines are great, but my question is why are they >useful for the average person, given current software? The average person isn't >doing more than one CPU intensive thing at once, if they are doing any CPU >intensive things, ever. > >The software has to take advantage of multiple processors so that it can speed >up tasks for single-processor humans, and that is a bitch. > >Aside from chess programs, I don't do anything that is CPU-intensive, except >maybe some games, which seem to run fine now on my 550 mhz Intel machine. In >fact, everything seems to run fine now. If I have to sit and wait for something >it is typically modem bandwidth (56K modem here) or internet lag. > >So if they are going to be common, why? What is the upside for the typical home >user or semi-casual business user? > >bruce I am a structural engineer, and I have a Spanish program, called "Cypecad", that needs a lot of processing speed and RAM memory. Last week I run a structure of a construction that delayed 1.5 hours on my PIII-450 with RAM=192Mb. Paulo Soares, from Brazil
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.