Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: About draws and chessprograms - a chessplayer's view

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 21:59:57 04/28/01

Go up one level in this thread


On April 28, 2001 at 16:41:23, Peter Berger wrote:

>On April 28, 2001 at 16:10:45, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On April 28, 2001 at 12:57:13, Peter Berger wrote:
>>
><snip>
>>>B.) Draw by repetition
>>>
><snip>
>>>9.2 The game is drawn, upon a correct claim by the player having the move, when
>>>the same position, for at least the third time (not necessarily by repetition of
>>>moves)
>>>
>>>a.) is about to appear, if he first writes his move on his scoresheet and
>>>declares to the arbiter his intention to make this move, or
>>>b.) has just appeared.
>>>
><snip>
>>>This is the correct way of doing it - no commercial chessprogram does it
>>>properly !
>>
>>I can't speak for commercial programs.  Mine does it properly.  It claims a
>>draw if the position has already been repeated 3 times, else it makes its
>>move and then claims the draw by repetition.
>>
>>I can't imagine any program _not_ doing this correctly.
>>
>
>No, crafty _doesn't_ do it properly . Simply read what you have written and
>compair it with the rule above .
>
>It is simply _wrong_ to make a move and then claim draw by repetition - that's
>not what the rule says .
>
>There doesn't seem to be a perfect way of doing it for an XBoard/WinBoard engine
>(probably the way Dieter Buerssner does it with Yace is a reasonable compromise
>though : read http://www.icdchess.com/forums/1/message.shtml?166276 )
>
>pete


I disagree.  Crafty can't "move pieces" on a real board.  But in any case,
I have never seen the rule state that you can _not_ make the move on the board.
The rule simply has always been that you must claim the draw on _your_ time.
Then the arbiter confirms the repetition.  In the case of computers, that is
obviously not necessary, but crafty says:

"my move is 49.  Rc8+

"The game is a draw by repetition"

then it waits for whatever happens next...

I don't see how a computer could do it any differently.

I have seen that scenario played in major WC type events.  I once watched
Korchnoi do exactly that in a US Open game...  He made the move on the board,
wrote it down, claimed a draw, and got the arbiter...




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.