Author: leonid
Date: 18:51:56 12/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
Hi, Heiner!
>>Just look into fact that with new depth procedure of search will be changed.
>>Specialized files, for instance, will be at new depth. Somewhere it can bring
>>different search sequence and with it even better time for higher depth.
>
>Aah! Yes, you have a point, here.
I tried today last position once again but starting this time search from 3
moves like, (3 4 5...). When before it was, (4 5 6...). Now I could see that
previous time for your program was wrong and your specilized plys work much,
much better that I could see previously. Fantastic!!!!! When before I found 0.11
sec for 4 moves, now I could see 0.0 sec.
This finding could signify that my guessing about ten fold possible speeding of
mate solver is very sober expectation. It reality, it could be much higher.
In the next position that I wrote yesterday, old tendency is more that present.
Our speed for 4 moves (all condition are the same) is around 9 times in your
favor. Mine at 4 moves is 0.44 sec. and your 0.05 sec. Even if mine have here
chance to have somehow better branching factor it reach your time only at 9
moves. Initial speed is really vital.
[D]3k4/3qqqrp/N1qq3R/NQ1Q3q/n2qNRPQ/n7/B6b/BqQrQbQK w - -
My time in general:
Move Time Branching factor NPS.
4 0.439 sec 38k
4.87
5 2.14 sec 36k
4.64
6 9.94 sec 36k
5.3
7 52.8 sec 49k
4.69
8 4 min 8 sec 57k
8.52
9 35 min 13 sec 64k
Mate found in 10 moves at 1 hour 53 min.
Cheers,
Leonid.
This page took 0.09 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.