Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 10:07:55 10/11/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 11, 2002 at 12:55:43, Daniel Clausen wrote: >On October 11, 2002 at 08:14:11, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On October 11, 2002 at 08:11:58, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On October 11, 2002 at 08:02:47, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >>> >>>>On October 11, 2002 at 00:59:36, Slater Wold wrote: >>>> >>>>Slate, everyone recognizes that deep thought was an >>>>absolute beginner. Do you agree? >>> >>>No >>> >>>I did not say that deep thought was an absolute beginner. >>>I believe that everybody is going to disagree with you about it. >>> >>>I believe that everybody's opinion is that deep thought can beat most of the >>>humans of today. >>> >>>i believe that everybody's opinion is that Deep thought can achieve today more >>>than fide rating of 2000 against humans and beginners cannot do it. >> >>2000 is beginners level to me. >> >>Look deep thought: >> >>5k2/7R/4P2p/5K2/p1r2P1p/8/8/8 b LCTFIN04 (...h3!) > >I wouldn't call it lying but you try to make DT weaker than it really is by >posting positions where the problem of the repetition recognition shows up. I >call it manipulating people though. Not very scientific.. it more resembles a >mud fight. > >Sargon the trivial thing about deep thought which people forget is that it got tens of millions of nodes a second. No one has problems believing that the current software generation is annihilating that. This despite that it was gettting way more nodes a second than current software. Why would beating DB a problem then?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.