Computer Chess Club Archives




Subject: Re: Dutch Open Leiden after round 6

Author: Johan Hutting

Date: 13:49:05 10/21/02

Go up one level in this thread

On October 21, 2002 at 16:19:57, Richard Pijl wrote:

>>'clearly better' is a bit harsch I suppose. I valued (a stable) ant at ~2300,
>>while baron is ~2200. It's been a while since I tested with Baron though.
>Which rating list have you been using?

I only consider Andreas Hermann's list usually, but unfortunately he stopped.
However, I was referring to the games baron played on my comp vs celes. I
downloaded it a couple of months ago, so it's possible that the version is
rather weak. I guess the use of 'is' is a bit confusing :) I meant I valued the
build I had at around 2200

>The ratings are rather the other way
>around. While Ant's rating should be quite stable (as the latest version is
>around for at least more than a year) Baron has improved a lot (so rating lists
>show a little too low rating). And the current version that is playing in Leiden
>is way stronger than the latest released version. Just look at what it is doing
>in WBEC division 2 at the moment...

Which was my point to Uri, you can hardly compare results from earlier
(/released) versions with the ones used in tournaments, unless of course those
are identical.

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.