Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law"

Author: Jeremiah Penery

Date: 23:02:39 03/01/03

On March 01, 2003 at 20:23:24, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>I consider Intel a "name brand".  I consider AMD a "copier".  Nothing wrong with
>being a "copier" but it also means you are a "follower".  And 2nd place is all
>that a follower can _ever_ reach...

Matt already said most of what I wanted to say, so I will just give some
examples of 'follower' companies that eclipsed (or at least achieved parity)
with their 'leaders':

AOL, Dell, Boeing, International Paper, Exxon-Mobil, Wal-Mart, Visa, Federal
Express, FOX (television network)...  The list can go on.

Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 07:34:23 03/02/03
- Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 19:18:35 03/02/03
  - Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 20:43:41 03/02/03
    - Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 19:05:39 03/03/03
      - Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 08:23:17 03/04/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 18:55:55 03/04/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 19:56:50 03/05/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Matt Taylor 14:03:32 03/07/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 15:05:34 03/06/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Andrew Dados 05:14:00 03/06/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Keith Evans 11:03:45 03/06/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 08:40:16 03/06/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Matt Taylor 14:42:42 03/07/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 20:37:24 03/07/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Matt Taylor 21:42:23 03/07/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 22:37:18 03/07/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 11:52:02 03/08/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 20:58:37 03/08/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 22:26:33 03/08/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 19:10:06 03/09/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 16:56:12 03/10/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 09:22:09 03/11/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Matt Taylor 19:03:59 03/11/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 17:17:57 03/11/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 20:29:48 03/11/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 16:20:40 03/12/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 19:50:07 03/12/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 13:33:42 03/13/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 21:16:47 03/13/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 15:48:18 03/14/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 20:47:40 03/14/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Steve J 05:12:01 03/11/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Andrew Dados 15:09:45 03/06/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Matt Taylor 10:33:50 03/04/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 11:58:21 03/04/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Matt Taylor 16:22:50 03/04/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 20:06:39 03/04/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 22:19:12 03/04/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 08:45:20 03/05/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Daniel Clausen 06:37:36 03/06/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 08:20:18 03/06/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 14:38:23 03/05/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 15:26:10 03/05/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 19:38:44 03/05/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 08:48:47 03/06/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Jeremiah Penery 14:47:45 03/06/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 15:23:59 03/06/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Keith Evans 07:34:16 03/07/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 20:39:06 03/07/03
    - Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Matt Taylor 23:09:52 03/02/03
      - Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 06:50:12 03/03/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Matt Taylor 13:44:12 03/03/03
        
        Re: Introducing "No-Moore's Law" Robert Hyatt 14:10:55 03/03/03

This page took 0.03 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.