Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?)

Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto

Date: 02:17:08 08/19/03

On August 19, 2003 at 05:04:58, Omid David Tabibi wrote:

>[D]3r2k1/pp1r1qpp/2pb4/5p2/3R1P2/8/PPPR2PP/3Q2K1 w - - 0 1
>
>My engine has information about all attacked squares, e.g., it knows that d6
>is attacked by a white rook and defended by a black rook. However, I assume
>that an SEE should be able to find out that Rxd6 is a winning capture. This
>needs a more extensive processing of backed-up attacks (e.g., Rd4 is backed up
>by Rd2 which is backed up by Qd1, and Rd7 is backed up by Rd8). I'm afraid
>this is too costly a process.

Hardly. You can look for the additional attackers after each capture
you try, in an incremental way. And given that there's not many directions
they can come from, this is fast...

--
GCP

Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Omid David Tabibi 02:25:25 08/19/03
- Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Steve Maughan 04:20:27 08/19/03
  - Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Omid David Tabibi 06:05:09 08/19/03
    - Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Tord Romstad 09:25:30 08/19/03
      - Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Dan Andersson 10:56:53 08/19/03
        
        Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Uri Blass 14:48:20 08/19/03
        
        Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Dan Andersson 14:57:38 08/19/03
        
        Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Russell Reagan 13:37:40 08/19/03
        
        Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Dan Andersson 14:12:21 08/19/03
        
        Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Peter Fendrich 14:26:43 08/19/03
        
        Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Dieter Buerssner 15:02:10 08/19/03
        
        Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Russell Reagan 14:29:46 08/19/03
        
        Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Peter Fendrich 14:59:59 08/19/03
        
        Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Sune Fischer 13:55:33 08/19/03
        
        Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Dan Andersson 14:53:35 08/19/03
        
        Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Sune Fischer 11:59:45 08/19/03
        
        Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Dan Andersson 12:24:59 08/19/03
        
        Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Sune Fischer 13:12:20 08/19/03
        
        Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Andrew Williams 10:30:56 08/20/03
        
        Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Dan Andersson 14:48:59 08/20/03
        
        Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Tord Romstad 08:52:18 08/21/03
        
        Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Dan Andersson 09:12:25 08/21/03
        
        Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Tord Romstad 11:48:33 08/19/03
        
        Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Dan Andersson 12:21:23 08/19/03
        
        Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Tord Romstad 08:57:03 08/21/03
        
        Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Dan Andersson 16:22:44 08/21/03
- Re: Static Exchange Evaluation (SEE) for pruning in quiescence (?) Gian-Carlo Pascutto 02:30:26 08/19/03

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.