Author: Peter Berger
Date: 17:04:20 01/05/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 05, 2004 at 16:29:06, Thorsten Czub wrote: >ok. >you don't have to agree on using f3. >with chess programs it is often that moves like f3 that FORCE a certain kind of >structure can be very effective WHEN THE PROGRAM THAT PLAYS IT has an idea what >to do. > >different programs play different opening structures very good. > >depending on playing style. > >the best player cannot play strong if he does not like the opening. Sorry Thorsten, I think I can somehow relate to your approach here in a _very_ general sense, but you just wrote nonsense in the analysis part. After 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. a3 ?? black just wins a pawn for nothing. Neither 1. d4 Nf6 2. f3 nor 1. d4 d5 2. Nc3 Nf6 3. f3 are in any way especially dangerous for the black side, in fact the opposite is closer to the truth. In case you meant to suggest that the Blackmar-Diemer gambit is a good opening for _any_ top chessprogram playing the white pieces against one of its competitors, I disagree again. When it is about this one I feel so strongly that I would be willing to take a bet, given that I can prepare the black side. So what is left? :) Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.