Author: Peter Berger
Date: 03:26:03 01/18/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 17, 2004 at 17:52:56, Uri Blass wrote: >1.Rg3+ Kh6 2.Rg1 Bd7 3.Re1 Bf5 4.Rf1 Kg6 5.Rg1+ Kf7 6.Kh5 Be6 > +- (1.56) Depth: 32/51 01:01:57 1839652kN >1.Rg3+ Kh6 2.Rg1 Bd7 > +- (1.56) Depth: 32/51 01:41:06 2909299kN >1.Rd1 Be6 2.Rg1+ Kh6 3.Re1 Bd7 4.Rd1 Bc8 5.Rf1 Kg6 6.Rg1+ Kh6 7.Kg3 Be6 8.Kf4 >Bd7 > +- (1.57) Depth: 32/51 01:55:52 3277019kN > This is what I get with Yace with a full set of tablebases: 1.Td1 Le6 2.Te1 Ld7 3.Tg1+ Kh6 4.Kg3 Kg7 5.Kf4+ Kf7 6.Te1 Kg6 7.Te3 Kf7 8.Kg3 Lc8 9.Kh4 Kg6 ± (1.28) Tiefe: 31/50 01:15:18 1203546kN 1.Td1 Le6 2.Te1 Ld7 3.Tg1+ Kh6 4.Kg3 Kg7 5.Kf4+ Kf7 6.Ke4 Le6 7.Kd4 ± (1.29) Tiefe: 32/51 01:39:17 1469856kN 1.Td1 Le6 2.Te1 Ld7 3.Tg1+ Kh6 4.Kg3 Kg7 5.Kf4+ Kf7 6.Ke4 Le6 7.Kd4 ± (1.29) Tiefe: 32/51 01:48:42 1545246kN So I don't think it has really found anything interesting. I had a look at some somehow similar positions in Dwojetzki's endgame university book, and I would be very surprised if your position were won.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.