Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Hydra Mystery Remains Unsolved

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 10:42:37 02/18/04

Go up one level in this thread


On February 18, 2004 at 11:15:28, Bob Durrett wrote:
[snip]
>Anthony, sometimes programmers look down their noses at hardware people like me.
> But if there were no hardware, programmers would be as helpless as a newborn
>baby.  There is more that is worthy than just programming.

Will Rogers said it best:
"Everyone is ignorant, only in different areas."

Something like "What caused the space shuttle explosion?"  Probably can't be
answered in one sentence.  Similarly, the contrasts and similarities between
hardware and firmware and software development are intricate issues and
difficult to explain.

A lot of people are going to respond to the hype of the whole Hydra thing, which
is fine.  It *is* an interesting chess development (even if the chief developer
is a bit of a loon).  I think the real frustration is that explaining 'why the
hype is hype' is not comprehended.

Here is what we have with Hydra:
A very interesting chess machine that could very well be the strongest chess
playing engine that money can buy ( if you have a big enough pile of money ).
But in a few years the investment may look foolish as the software approach will
be faster.

So, if you have a big pile of money, you want to win all the time now, and you
are not afraid of some "early development issues" go ahead and buy a cluster of
PC's and a load of Hydra boards.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.