Author: Bryan Hofmann
Date: 12:47:23 06/08/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 08, 2004 at 13:19:51, Joachim Rang wrote: >On June 08, 2004 at 08:47:36, Bryan Hofmann wrote: > >>On June 08, 2004 at 08:11:54, Joachim Rang wrote: >> >>>On June 08, 2004 at 06:36:37, Chris Taylor wrote: >>> >>>>Have not had time to fully experiment with the thing yet, but early indications >>>>show it to be a tad faster. Will do some bench marking! >>>> >>>>Any one had any good reports with the C 1.7? >>>> >>>>I would like to squeeze some more nps for Crafty, and Rebel 12.. >>>> >>>>Chris >>> >>> >>>The Athlon XP 3000+ is clocked with 2100 MHz and according to this page it will >>>peform worse than the Pentium - M 1.7 Ghz, but don't forget the Athlon XP 3000+ >>>costs half the price of C 1.7. An AMD 64 3000+ which is still much cheaper than >>>an C 1.7 is even faster than C 1.7 and will gain from 64 Bit - Software in the >>>near future: >>> >>>http://www.beepworld.de/members39/computerschach2/chessmarks.htm >> >>My standard non-overclocked XP 3000+ is at 2171 Mhz and I see no performance >>results on this page that indicate that the C 1.7 is faster than the XP 3000+. > > >than you have the "old" XP 3000+ the one with higher MHz and slower FSB. >Nevertheless for Fritz the Pentium - M 1.7 Ghz should be a bit faster than your >3000+ No it is not old and the FSB is 166/333 same as the other XPs except the 3200+ which has 200/400 FSB. > >Centrino 1.7 GHz 1166 KN/s Norbert Baumann > >AMD XP 2700+/2167 1080 kN/s Michael42 > There is no such animal as a XP 2700+, They only made XP 2500+, XP 2800+ XP 3000+ and XP 3200+. One of the biggest differences in the XP is that it has twice the L2 cache (512KB) of the Thoroughbred-B core (256KB). So the above comparison of using this Thoroughbred-B 2700+ is not the same as a XP3000+. >regards Joachim > >P.S.: Do yoo owe Fritz 8? It would be interesting if you could run a Fritzmark Don't have any commercial engines. As far as benchmarking goes with something like a chess engine it is really going to depend on how it was compiled and what CPU it is optimzed for. Most commercial programs tend to favor Intel based CPUs for marketing reasons.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.