Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: IBM hired the wrong people because it won?

Author: blass uri

Date: 21:43:51 01/10/99

Go up one level in this thread



On January 10, 1999 at 17:52:47, KarinsDad wrote:

>On January 10, 1999 at 13:57:19, blass uri wrote:
>
>[snip]
>
>>
>>I know that the loser is always losing by doing a mistake but the point is that
>>kasparov did mistakes that he usually does not do.
>
>How often does Kasparov make a mistake that nobody catches? Probably quite
>often, but of very minor consequence. The reason is there are very few
>individuals (and programs) that could analyze to the level that they would catch
>something that Kasparov does not catch over the board.
>
>Any minor mistake that Kasparov makes is fair game for a program as powerful as
>Deep Blue to capitalize on. Even if only in an extremely minor manner.
>
>>
>>Resigning in a draw position is not a mistake that kasparov did in the past.
>
>Except that Kasparov changed his tactics based on the fact that he was playing
>Deep Blue. That worked in the first match, but failed in the second. Presumably,
>the Deep Blue team learned something from the first match.
>
>Humans make mistakes for different reasons than computers. Humans make mistakes
>because they are tired, low blood sugar, emotional considerations,
>mis-calculations, and not truly understanding the position. Computers only make
>mistakes because their algoritms did not truly understand the position and all
>of it's implications.
>
>Kasparov lost because he thought he was lost and could not swindle the computer.
>If he had been in that same position against another human, his thought
>processes may have been different and he may have thought that he could have
>played on. His mistake was not just in not seeing the draw, but rather also in
>assuming that if he himself could not make a mistake in his analysis and that
>the computer would not miss the win. He made a typical mistake that humans make
>against computers. He thought that within a given position, the computer would
>be infallible in winning.
>
>>
>>Going to a line that he was not ready to go to is not a mistake that humans
>>usually do.
>
>Humans do this all of the time, the instant they get out of their own book (or
>at the GM level, when their opponent plays a theoretical novelty). If not at
>move 5, at move 10, or at move 15, or whereever.

In the last game kasparov simply replaced the order of moves.
He played a line that he recommended not to play in his book.
This is not something that he does all the time.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.