Computer Chess Club Archives




Subject: Re: guilty until probed the opposite

Author: Romang Jean-Francois

Date: 01:46:18 05/29/05

Go up one level in this thread

I totally agree with you. Most people agree that these 'proofs' are not engouth
to say Fafis is a clone. After reading all this thread I think this is an insult
to Fafis author's reputation ; if I were him I would be really disgusted - at
best i would make my engine private, or move to an other hobby.

I think cloning is cheating, and must be hunted ; but with respect to authors.
If someone accuses an engine to be a clone, he must collect A LOT of PROOFS
before exposing his feeling to the world. Asking an author to proove his
innocence by showing his source code is not an option.

This page took 0.02 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.