Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: guilty until probed the opposite

Author: Romang Jean-Francois

Date: 01:46:18 05/29/05

Go up one level in this thread


I totally agree with you. Most people agree that these 'proofs' are not engouth
to say Fafis is a clone. After reading all this thread I think this is an insult
to Fafis author's reputation ; if I were him I would be really disgusted - at
best i would make my engine private, or move to an other hobby.

I think cloning is cheating, and must be hunted ; but with respect to authors.
If someone accuses an engine to be a clone, he must collect A LOT of PROOFS
before exposing his feeling to the world. Asking an author to proove his
innocence by showing his source code is not an option.




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.