Author: milix
Date: 06:38:54 06/22/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 22, 2005 at 09:05:32, Daniel Mehrmannn wrote: >On June 22, 2005 at 07:36:50, Andrey Popov wrote: > >>>There is really no reason why you should compile fruit. >>There are many things that somebody wants to change and experiment with. Only >>some of them are tunable via UCI options. I also wonder which of five novations >>in 2.1 after 2.0 is responsible for such huge improvement. I want to turn off >>them one by one and compare. There are no options in Fruit 2.1 to do it. >>> >>>All other things/reasons looks not so happy for me. >>I suspect you think about yet another clone ;) >>I think nobody who reads CCC will produce new clones, >>because there is already no fun (he will not be the first guy who made a clone) >>and there are no chances to hide it. > >Thats a little bit more complicated. If the users see that we're helping each >user may more and more users starting request. You really don't know the >reasons of each user why they are want this. You can't control this too and may >become more problems. Clones are one point yes, but the list is long. > >So we need a general hard line to handle it fair for all. Otherwise a user could >say "You helped Mr. X, why not me ?" And so on. > >So my opinion is all should get the same support, here specialy no support. > >daniel This is totally against the reason Fruit released source code. If someone is prohibited to try his own ideas what is the point of releasing source code of chess engines? @Andrey Popov, anyway, when I use the free visual studio compiler I use the following compiling flags: /nologo /O2 /G6 /MT /W3 /GX /Ob2 /DWIN32 /EHsc If this cannot help either try to cast the 64bit key to 32bit by yourself: unsigned int key32; key32 = (unsigned int)board->material_key; entry = &Material->table[key32 & Material->mask];
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.