Author: Drexel,Michael
Date: 11:25:23 07/01/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 01, 2005 at 13:41:05, Otello Gnaramori wrote:
>On July 01, 2005 at 09:18:09, Rolf Tueschen wrote:
>
>>Since my perfect chessmachine ROLF played only 75% of the HYDRA moves against
>>Adams, you can see how far away HYDRA is still from perfect play. That is why
>>it's still making sense if more GM play show events.
>
>It's a path near to perfect, perfection is a "chimera" , but it's stronger than
>strongest humans listening to Mr. Adams words...that is why it's so damn
>difficult to beat:
Don´t spout Nonsense here.
Hydra is a "strategical Patzer" like all the other machines.
Just a couple of minutes ago I saw a game from it.
White had a draw by repetition in this game despite of the opening 1.a3,2.b3?,
but Shredder was even more a stupid than Hydra and lost.
White could even win this game with 19.Rxd6!. An exchange sacrifice which leads
to a strategical won position. I saw this move immediately.
2...e5 is clearly better than 2...Nf6?!.
Michael
[Event "10m + 10s, rated"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2005.07.01"]
[Round "?"]
[White "OLIVIER-EVAN, Shredder 9"]
[Black "Ares01, Hydra/Scylla-1.06bC"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "A00"]
[WhiteElo "2635"]
[BlackElo "2880"]
[PlyCount "95"]
[EventDate "2005.07.01"]
[EventType "rapid"]
1. a3 {0} d5 {0} 2. b3 {0} Nf6 {27} 3. Nf3 {0} e6 {34} 4. e3 {0} Bd6 {34} 5. d4
{0} O-O {27} 6. Bb2 {0} Ne4 {35} 7. Bd3 {28} c6 {19} 8. c4 {51} f5 {0} 9. O-O {
35} b6 {7} 10. Nc3 {30} Ba6 {31} 11. Ne2 {24} Qf6 {19} 12. Nf4 {36} Qh6 {0} 13.
Ne5 {26} Ng5 {51} 14. Rc1 {34} Rd8 {22} 15. cxd5 {13} cxd5 {4} 16. f3 {23} Bxd3
{15} 17. Qxd3 {68} Nd7 {30} 18. Rc6 {49} Nb8 {35} 19. Rc2 {7} Nd7 {14} 20. Qd2
{9} Nf7 {17} 21. Rc6 {48} Nb8 {15} 22. Rc2 {5} Nd7 {10} 23. Rc6 {36} Nb8 {23}
24. Nxf7 {0} Kxf7 {14} 25. Rc3 {5} Nd7 {19} 26. Rc6 {71} Nb8 {0} 27. Rc2 {15}
Nd7 {13} 28. a4 {61} Rac8 {29} 29. Rxc8 {22} Rxc8 {8} 30. Rc1 {38} Rxc1+ {0}
31. Qxc1 {16} Qh4 {10} 32. g3 {21} Qe7 {8} 33. Qc6 {9} Nb8 {28} 34. Qc8 {17}
Qd7 {3} 35. Qc3 {27} Bxf4 {15} 36. gxf4 {20} Qc6 {22} 37. Qd2 {8} Qc7 {9} 38.
Ba3 {21} Nc6 {5} 39. Qc3 {22} Ke8 {1} 40. b4 {18} Qd7 {17} 41. Kf2 {24} a6 {27}
42. Qc2 {18} Na7 {22} 43. a5 {18} Qc6 {16} 44. Qxc6+ {20} Nxc6 {0} 45. axb6 {17
} Kd7 {8} 46. e4 {3} Kc8 {15} 47. Ke3 {0} Kb7 {15} 48. b5 {
OLIVIER-EVAN,Shredder 9 abandonne (Lag: Av=0.86s, max=1.7s) 0} 0-1
>From Adams interview at chessbase
>...
>"I think it proves that Hydra is a much stronger ‘player’ than any other
>computer in the world. We may not be able to measure its strength in Elo, but it
>is huge. I also suspect Hydra is stronger than any other human opponent. Okay,
>it has to be proved in the future, but this is my impression at the moment and I
>suspect it is accurate. I mean from my point of view I don’t think I played
>terribly. I did my best and it just wasn’t good enough."
>
>
>w.b.r.
>Otello
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.