Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: midlifecrisis

Author: Ed Schröder

Date: 00:49:52 08/22/05

Go up one level in this thread


On August 22, 2005 at 03:39:06, Thorsten Czub wrote:

>i have shortened the whole text a litte. and when i read this,
>it looks like a midlife crisis to me.
>
>May I quote Stefan Meyer-Kahlen:
>
>"With 1,5 points from 2 rounds, Shredder looks very promising in the tournament,
>especially as my previous opponents are certainly among the
>wider circle of favourites.
>
>After the first day, two newcomers are on top of the list:
>Fruit from France and Zappa from the U.S, both having two points out of two
>rounds.
>
>In the third round's top-match Zappa defeated Fruit
>which brought him the single lead with three points from three games
>
>If Shredder wants to get the title, he must defeat the presumed outsiders.
>
>Considering that, the draw is a fair result.
>It also keeps Shredder among the tournament's leaders.
>
>Shredder gained an advantage in the opening, but then the game slackened,
>and for a long time it looked like a clear draw. But then Fruit played very
>strong and after five hours and almost 100 moves I had to resign for Shredder.
>That, of course, is a severe set-back for my title ambitions. I have to admit
>though that Fruit played very well indeed in this game. Shredder also took one
>of his legendary rests, contemplating endlessly over a certain position.
>This time he invested ten minutes for this position,
>but it didn't help him. After five rounds Zappa heads the list with 4,5 points
>6 rounds are still to play, so there is still something possible. However,
>I need a bit of luck to win the tournament now.
>
>After 8 rounds Zappa has now 7,5 points followed by a lot of persecutors
>with 5,5 points: Shredder, Junior, Deep Sjeng, Fruit and Crafty.
>It's rather hard for Zappa not to win the tournament now. Tomorrow Shredder
>faces Zappa.
>
>Although the programmers do not have to ponder about
>the moves during a computerchess tournament,
>operating a chess program is very exhausting.
>I feel very tired at the moment, perhaps this somehow infected Shredder.
>
>Apparently Shredder knew that he had to win.
>From the very beginning he marched forward attacking hard.
>But Zappa defended tremendously and turned the tide through some very good
>moves.
>
>Shredder's attack fizzled out and Zappa's counter-attack was too strong.
>Very well played by Zappa; somehow everyone here is playing superb.
>Zappa is most certainly the new World Champion now,
>while Shredder only plays for the golden lemon.
>
>Two more rounds are still to play, yet
>most likely we will already have a new World Champion after the
>10 th round tonight.
>
>So Anthony Cozzie, Zappa's programmer, is the new World Champion in computer
>chess.
>
>
>
>Congratulations to Anthony for this outstanding performance.
>Zappa played really impressively and undoubtedly deserved the title.
>With one round to play, Zappa has 9,5 points.
>Fruit is in second place with 7,5 points. Shredder, Junior and Deep Sjeng
>follow with 6,5 points. Tomorrow Shredder will face Junior.
>For the last ten years, this was the match for the title,
>but this time it is probably just played for third place.
>
>
>As mentioned earlier, the game wasn't that important, however.
>
>
>Fruit also won, so that the final table shows Zappa on top with 10,5 points
>followed by Fruit with 8,5 points.
>Shredder captured a shared third place
>
>
>Third place in a World Championship is certainly a very good result.
>However, I wanted to win with Shredder, of course.
>
>
>Zappa and Fruit have both played very strong,
>so the third place for Shredder is quite ok in the end. "


A fair, honest and realistic review if you ask me. You seem to think you can
plan a WC title? The truth about WCCC's is that if it were possible to replay
the event you most probably get another WC.

Get real Thorsten :)

Ed



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.