Author: Roger D Davis
Date: 13:25:14 08/22/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 22, 2005 at 15:18:34, James Swafford wrote: >On August 22, 2005 at 14:57:59, Roger D Davis wrote: > >>On August 22, 2005 at 12:42:43, Peter Skinner wrote: >> >>>Hello everyone, >>> >>>I have recieved numerous emails asking when the "CCT Blitz" tournament will be >>>held. >>> >>>Since this is "your" tournament and I am willing to run it, I am open to >>>suggestions as to date, time control, or if there is enough interest for it. >>> >>>This is what I had in mind: >>>------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>RULES: >>> >>>Site: >>>The Internet Chess Club (as always) >>> >>>Rounds: >>>13 round swiss. >>> >>>Time controls: 15 0 >>> >>>Date: Late September/Early October >>> >>>All games to be played in one weekend: >>>6 games on Saturday >>>7 on day Sunday >>> >>>In the event of a tie situation: >>> >>>There will be co-winners awarded. >>> >>>1. No manually operated programs, and all programs must kibitz their evaluation, >>>and book moves/TB hits if possible. Providing as much information as possible >>>for the viewers and participants is key here. It should also be noted that 1-3 >>>lines of text is sufficient. No need to scroll out an entire page :) >>> >>>2. In the event of a disconnection, the party will be given 5 minutes to return >>>to complete the game and no more than 2 disconnections per game will be allowed. >>>On the third time, the game will be a forfeit. >>> >>>3. Only the author or an approved operator (Author must email the TD in such >>>case to grant approval). There will be no clones allowed. >>> >>>4. Participants can use any hardware they can bring. Participants choosing to >>>use remotely located hardware are recommended to have a suitable back up >>>solution in the event there is an uncorrectable malfunction. >>> >>>5. No entries will be accepted 2 days prior to the start date of the tournament. >>>This is to ensure that advertising, web sites, and any promotional tools are >>>accurate at start time. This is also to ensure participants have enough time to >>>test their program on the ICC servers to ensure it is able to play. >>> >>>5a. In the event that there is a late withdrawal or uneven amounts of players, >>>the TD can substitute a program in place of the departing entrant to keep the >>>numbered entries the same. And to avoid a bye round. >>> >>>6. Seeding. The below formula will be used to determine seedings: >>> >>>6a. A panel of 5 people will be polled where they would seed the list of >>>entrants. These people will be from the Computer Chess Club, and are >>>active/knowledgeable individuals. This group of people will also be anonymously >>>selected, and results will only be known by final seedings. An average of these >>>5 polled people will determine the seedings for the tournament. >>>------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>>Basically the same as CCT7 but with a shorter time control. As it is 15 0, we >>>can play 7 round in 4 hours (allowing for pairings). That is a pretty easy day. >>> >>>If you have any suggestions, please post them here or email me. >>> >>>Peter >> >> >>Play enough games to minimize the "you didn't play enough games" criticism. >> >>That might mean that in each pairing, the authors play a four game set, and then >>report the results of the games to the TD when they're done. Obviously, shorter >>time controls allow more games. But...if people want to participate in a >>tournament and have the results be meaningful, then they ought to commit. >> >>This could lead to some excitement, I think, since there will be more games, and >>some opponents will be swept 4-0 by others. > >No, that sucks. Part of the excitement of a tournament IS that >anything can happen! If you want meaningful data, go look at an >SSDF list... > > I'm not suggesting thousands of games be played...I'm suggesting that there's some optimum of randomness that makes for an exciting tournament, and that more games might be needed than what the pairings ordinarily allow. The authors usually commit one or two weekends to the CCTs anyway...why pull all these people together and then have the event wrap up in just a few hours? If you're going to pull all those authors together, it might as well be for more than just a few hours, and the results ought to mean something to the winner. Roger
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.