Author: Pablo Ignacio Restrepo
Date: 07:31:17 11/24/05
Go up one level in this thread
Hello A. Steen. The problem of antichess is more complex that its looks in a simple evaluation. To fix engines will create not compatibles paradigmas : Why ? > 1- Bercouse Top engines that will be fixing, wont be Word Chess Computer Champion in a combat between engines that have present kind of module preferences. 2- And about Top human beings chess players..... What are they going to do? They are going finally been playing a pure antichess(at lest some times), becouse they are going to be in serious trobles with many many "anticomputer experts" that know that they are not making a good Job like last game from Ponomartiov against Junior. 3- In my humbble opinion = There are not solution, ............ the paradigmas are going to be broken ......... and a "new chess will be played by the best human beings" ,,,,,,,antichess=destructive chess=chess in the other fase of the coin= a chess where you only want to be runing from the oponent to destroy him-her-it .......etc Best, Pablo On November 23, 2005 at 19:45:29, A. Steen wrote: >On November 23, 2005 at 10:04:47, Dr. Wael Deeb wrote: > >>....are you seriously recommneding to save your games as an exeptional ones?If >>you speak seriously,you must proceed for a serious psyheatric check up my >>friend!! > >While it is extreme and unacceptable to suggest that a psychiatric remedy may be >needed, I too find these games a little distasteful. > >Novices and patzers (i.e., as far as I have sampled to date, the local >population) may think they actually are learning something chessical from these >miscellaneous oscillations. :( > >Perhaps this nouveau "chess knowledge" makes such claim that GM Kasimdzhanov's >brilliancy on move 26 of his round 1 match vs Hydra at Bilbao was a blunder, or >a prelude to a suicidal attack, etc. In fact it leads to a safe draw provided >K. does not blunder. > >But I digress. Back to these oscillations! It is a psychiatric fact, and I >speak with some knowledge here, that contemplating monotonical oscillatory >movements with certain frequencies can induce a variety of disturbances. :) > >However, you may have overlooked that there is a small benefit from this type of >unchessical thing. > >"Father" is costing these chess engines "points". :) > >Maybe this will in some way result in pressure on authors to eventually work to >ensure that their programs deal with these issues - >clock-handling in closed positions >avoiding closed positions >breaking out of closed positions, sacrificing if necessary > >[D]6rk/3bb2q/np1p2rn/1NpPp2p/1PP1PpP1/P2Q3P/1R3NP1/3BBRK1 w - - 0 30 > >What, for example, could make any reasonable player think that the above >position is "+= or better for white"? Just look at what is bearing down on the >hapless WK. > >These oscillations! > >What do you think, both of the positive aspects of these "chess" games (i.e., to >motivate authors) and of the negative (see above). > >Best, > >A.S.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.