Author: Vasik Rajlich
Date: 05:34:56 01/29/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 28, 2006 at 12:17:17, Jonas Soderberg wrote: >Hi there, >Now when Rybka (and other programs as well) are getting so good, and we actually >start to belive not only in their moves but also in their analysis output. > >How should one present this to the user? Do you guys have any ideas? > >Can we, this year, have a true positional (GM) chess coach on our PCs? > >I would for instans like too see in "positional grammar" the reasons why to make >a move and why not to make a move. > >The tactical reasons are often more obvious... > >Regards, >/Jonas There is going to be some activity here in the next year. For the time being, the solutions are going to be graphical (ie. these are the good pieces, squares, paths) rather than linguistic. Current attempts at linguistic analysis are pretty useless, I don't really think we're ready for that yet. Vas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.