Author: Christopher R. Dorr
Date: 05:48:27 07/01/99
Go up one level in this thread
Are you certain that the use of computers is legal in this Championship? I strongly doubt that it is. I haven't played correspondence chess in several years, but at the time I specifically remember that computers were *not* allowed. I hadn't heard that they changed the rules. I know that *a few* correspondence tournaments allow the use of computers, but I'm very surprised if the WC did. Chris Dorr On July 01, 1999 at 01:43:49, blass uri wrote: >This position is from the game Albert levin-avi keter(1/2 final of world >correspondence championship) >2rq2k1/4r3/3b3p/3P1pp1/1pN5/1B1Q1P1b/1P5P/R2R3K w - - 0 1 > >Avi keter won the first place in the competition. >It is legal to use computers. > >I believe that Albert levin did not use a computer seriously because computer >programs can avoid 38.Nxd6 and find 38.Rg1 if you give them a long time(many >hours). > >albert levin played 38.Nxd6? and if Qxd6 then 39.Ra6? >and this was a mistake >Avi keter says that 38.Nxd6 is missing a win when 39.Ra6 is missing the draw. >39.Re1,39.f4,39.Rg1 are better than 39.Ra6. > >albert levin lost after 39...Rce8 40.Rg1? Bg2+ 41.Rxg2 Re1+ 42.Rg1 Qc5 43.d6+ >Kg7 44.Rf1 Qf2 > >What is the result of programs(how much time do they need to avoid 38.Nxd6 and >to avoid 39.Ra6) > >Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.