Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 05:53:40 09/25/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 25, 1999 at 05:36:15, Harald Faber wrote: >How comes that I expected this argument? >1) a program should play well on each hardware, especially well when playing >another opponent on same or even slower hardware you don't understand how programs are developed and tuned and tested. >2) I bet that if I had 2 K6-3-400 and would play this match again, the result >would not differ much and again you would want a faster hardware. i am sure whenever YOU would test something you don't like, it would fail in your testings, yes. >Isn't it strange that you always find excuses when Tal loses, Don Quixote? i don't find excuses when it loses. i do find strangeness in your testing- environment. Your way of handle losses of other programs against tal is comments that i am cheating, and when others have results pro tal you don't comment at all. so i don't see why your kind of REaction is with higher moral than mine , Homo Faber. >And Patzers ALWAYS have excuses when they lose. now you speak about yourself ? >The only way to stop critics like me is to show me/us much better results or let >me/us reproduce better results. Others HAVE shown you better results. you don't react in words. you lose the power of speech in the moment the world produces data you don't like. >But there is a deep lack in better results as >the only one doing it is you... and all the others here having posted good results and data ? you don't even see them and their posts :-) funny Faber, you seem to have a problem with your eyes. the famous faber-filter. >>it was not designed to play what YOU call "sound" sacs. >Then it plays like mad because what I call sound is an attacking sac which leds >to a win or if it was not really correct, leads to a draw. I do not need >incorrect sacs. And i don't need you. you are as senseless as an incorrect sac is. people like you always complaining - testing in strange ways - cstal does not need you. better delete it from your harddisc. we will have to change the licence agreement of cstal3: people like harald should better not buy cstal. they are forbidden to buy it. we will make a command that erases the harddisc in the moment it recognized that it is harald. :-) > Every patzer can play incorrect sacs. right. every human beeing. >As Bob already said, it is nice to have an exciting playing style, but it is >better to have a win ratio >50% and no user wants to have a program getting >25-40% only. aha. >So Tal is designed to play incorrect sacs to lead humans astray? >Sorry, I can only laugh about that. :-))))) laugh. i have nothing against you laughing. >For YOU, yes, because I cannot show discrediting results anymore and you can >continue your false propaganda. i am not doing any propaganda. propaganda is what YOU do: posting things without having the hardware nor the software nor the knowledge nor the data to say something. it is YOU posting prejudice, not me. I do have the hardware, the software and the data and have tested the programs long time before i post.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.