Author: Harald Faber
Date: 06:22:24 09/25/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 25, 1999 at 08:53:40, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On September 25, 1999 at 05:36:15, Harald Faber wrote: > >>How comes that I expected this argument? >>1) a program should play well on each hardware, especially well when playing >>another opponent on same or even slower hardware > >you don't understand how programs are developed and tuned and tested. If this is meant that I do not adjust my hardware to special program requests, yes. And especially not when YOU say "for accurate CSTal play, one needs at least an AMD-K6-3-500 or K7-XXX". And I still doubt CSTal then can compete with the other top programs, because, don't forget, the others get the speed profit too. Except you want to try CSTal/K7-600 vs MCP/166MMX. :-) >>2) I bet that if I had 2 K6-3-400 and would play this match again, the result >>would not differ much and again you would want a faster hardware. > >i am sure whenever YOU would test something you don't like, it would >fail in your testings, yes. You are absolutely wrong. I really HOPED to see Tal win. But I cannot change facts. >>Isn't it strange that you always find excuses when Tal loses, Don Quixote? > >i don't find excuses when it loses. i do find strangeness in your testing- >environment. Now finally you really got mad. I did exactly what you asked for, except that I am not that fool to buy 2 new PCs for $2000-$3000 to get Tal run on an "accurate" machine. Your behaviour looks like Chessbase autoplayer. Absolutely stupid. >Your way of handle losses of other programs against tal >is comments that i am cheating, and when others have results pro tal >you don't comment at all. so i don't see why your kind of REaction >is with higher moral than mine , Homo Faber. Show me more results than a) your results and b) more than this posted 2-2 against Hiarcs7.32 and don't forget to sum up the Tal losses like that 6-0 or my 7.5-2.5. >>And Patzers ALWAYS have excuses when they lose. > >now you speak about yourself ? I do not excuse a thing. You always excuse the losses. First it was the version. Now it is the hardware although Tal used 50% faster hardware than the opponent. I wonder what you'd have said if I had played on 2 K6-3-500, probably that I should have used the K7 or P3 or any other senseless story. >>The only way to stop critics like me is to show me/us much better results or let >>me/us reproduce better results. > >Others HAVE shown you better results. you don't react in words. you lose the >power of speech in the moment the world produces data you don't like. There was none except in your dreams and in your tournaments. >and all the others here having posted good results and data ? All the others? I must be blind having overseen hundreds of posters with super results. >>>it was not designed to play what YOU call "sound" sacs. > >>Then it plays like mad because what I call sound is an attacking sac which leds >>to a win or if it was not really correct, leads to a draw. I do not need >>incorrect sacs. > >And i don't need you. >you are as senseless as an incorrect sac is. Typical for you. No more arguments so you go one step further onto the personal level. Childish. >people like you always complaining - testing in strange ways - cstal does not >need you. better delete it from your harddisc. we will have to change >the licence agreement of cstal3: people like harald should better not >buy cstal. they are forbidden to buy it. we will make a command that erases >the harddisc in the moment it recognized that it is harald. :-) You do not need to fear that I will buy another version of CST and complain until more than 2 persons except you find out that Tal can compete with the top programs. >>For YOU, yes, because I cannot show discrediting results anymore and you can >>continue your false propaganda. > >i am not doing any propaganda. propaganda is what YOU do: posting things >without having the hardware nor the software nor the knowledge nor the >data to say something. it is YOU posting prejudice, not me. Of course, you are absolutely objective, posting only the few Tal wins and hiding the losses. >I do have the hardware, the software and the data and have tested the programs >long time before i post. Maybe you need such a long time to get 2 or 3 wins. :-) And your hardware argument is absolutely rubbish.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.