Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Fritz, Hiarcs... CB Updates Broken

Author: Dave Gomboc

Date: 11:11:39 10/09/99

Go up one level in this thread


On October 09, 1999 at 13:55:46, Ratko V Tomic wrote:

>That seems to be dependent on how frequent given opening line was in its book.
>If it was rare with, say, just a handful of wins for one side, even a handful of
>games makes the significant change. In my case, after it locked into the same
>line (nimzowitsch opening), the book showed 100% vs 0% for one side, and no
>matter how you scale that it still remains 100% vs 0%, i.e. the most successful
>line. At that point I had an option to check the literature and find a good
>counter and then win enough games in that line to offset the nonscalable ratio
>or reinstall the book from scratch. Reinstalling seemed quicker, so I did that,
>and set the learning influence to minimal, variety to maximal, but few days
>later again it locked into the single line (again nimzo). So at that point I
>reinstalled the book again and turned off the learning. But a day later when it
>started again playing nimzo several times in a row, I finally reinstalled the
>book and turned the file attributes to read only, and that finally made the
>variety of openings Ok. Another problem with "learning" was that at some point
>it threw away entire Sicilian from its repertoire after losing couple games for
>reasons well beyond the opening. I am not sure why, their bugs and poorly
>thought out design choices are sometimes hard to distinguish (they did have a
>good artist, their stuff is visually the best of the bunch).

Wiping e.g. the Sicilian from its repertoire is probably a reaction to "that
other computer seems to play these kinds of middlegames better than I do.  I'd
better find an opening system that it doesn't understand so well."  Of course,
if it's completely overmatched, it should retain variety because everything will
look bad. :-)

I don't disagree at all that this behavior is extremely undesirable from a
sparring partner standpoint.

Dave



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.