Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 23:12:44 10/14/99
Go up one level in this thread
On October 15, 1999 at 01:24:48, Ratko V Tomic wrote: >I was talking in this thread about current state of the art alpha-beta >searchers. The deeper they look the greater is the percentage of junk positions >they weed through, and that is an exponential convergence toward 0 percent of >useful positions examined. Yes of course, they see more useful positions too, >just because they see so many more positions in absolute numbers, but the net >efficiency in useful processing still drops exponentially toward zero with the >depth. And this type of phenomenon, in any kind of evolving or competing system, >can only mean one thing ahead: a dead end, an extinction. I'd appreciate seeing an instrumented program that demonstrates this behavior. I think your assertion is false for today's state-of-art chess programs. Caveat: I don't consider a position to be "junk" if looking at it helps to establish that a predecessor position is not "junk". Dave
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.