Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: DB will never play with REBEL, they simple are afraid no to do well

Author: Dave Gomboc

Date: 23:12:44 10/14/99

Go up one level in this thread


On October 15, 1999 at 01:24:48, Ratko V Tomic wrote:

>I was talking in this thread about current state of the art alpha-beta
>searchers. The deeper they look the greater is the percentage of junk positions
>they weed through, and that is an exponential convergence toward 0 percent of
>useful positions examined. Yes of course, they see more useful positions too,
>just because they see so many more positions in absolute numbers, but the net
>efficiency in useful processing still drops exponentially toward zero with the
>depth. And this type of phenomenon, in any kind of evolving or competing system,
>can only mean one thing ahead: a dead end, an extinction.

I'd appreciate seeing an instrumented program that demonstrates this behavior.
I think your assertion is false for today's state-of-art chess programs.
Caveat: I don't consider a position to be "junk" if looking at it helps to
establish that a predecessor position is not "junk".

Dave



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.