Author: José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba
Date: 14:23:23 01/23/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 23, 2000 at 12:46:36, Robert Hyatt wrote: [big snip] >Deep Thought's processor was a 1987 piece of hardware. By 1995 it had proven >itself to perform at a GM level, with three numbers you can choose from. An >official USCF rating of 2551 over almost 50 games. A TPR over its best 25 >consecutive games of 2650. And finally if you only count deep thought games >without the first few which had horrible hardware problems, it had a TPR of >2590. > >All are impressive. _all_ are 1986 hardware (the single processor version, >called "chiptest" first played in the 1986 ACM tournament.) > >So 1986 hardware produced a true GM-level machine, based on enough games that it >can't be considered a fluke or accident. > Sorry Bob, but I definitely do not consider these achievements as "true GM-level". Feel free to disagree. >Today, Rebel is trying to produce the same result, on hardware that is 14 years >newer. It is _very_ close to 2500. It isn't as close to 2650 (by taking the >best 25 games vs humans). But it might make 2500 by the Summer with a little >luck. > Rebel is playing against FIDE rated players. The 2650 you mention is USCF. >With the above data, how far _ahead_ of Rebel (in terms of time) would you say >DB-2 is? Rebel has yet to do what 1986 hardware has done. No other program >has yet produced a GM-class rating over 25 games. My guess is, as it always has >been, at _least_ 10 years behind. > >We can discuss any of the above that you like, of course... > >We have DT's results documented quite well. We have (thanks to Enrique) >Rebel's results so far. A few more months will push this to 25 solid >games... 1986 vs 1999 hardware. fairly close comparison in performance. > >Of course, we have the problem of the 1997 version of the Hardware to deal >with. :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.