Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 14:34:16 05/12/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 12, 2000 at 14:06:55, Hans Gerber wrote: >It doesn't look "good" to read "jerk" in your articles on and on. The question >must be allowed if you are still an objective scientific observer and thinker >for the whole question. A teacher, sure, can accuse his pupils of being dumb >nuts, but does this analogy is allowed in case of Kasparov, the chess genius? It >seems as if you wanted to continue the impolite, arrogant and aggressive style >of Murray Campell in the NY Times' article... Why? Substantiate this claim (that Murray Campbell's style in a NY Times' articles was impolite, arrgoant, and aggressive), or resign, Chris. [There, that's a real example of impolite, arrogant, and aggressive (accusatory, too, for good measure :-) for you to compare whatever Murray was quoted as saying against.] Dave
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.