Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Dr. Hyatt is right about chess programs not being GM level.

Author: Dave Gomboc

Date: 09:55:00 07/01/00

Go up one level in this thread


On July 01, 2000 at 12:21:51, Adrien Regimbald wrote:

>Hey,
>
>>Chinook is better at checkers than anything else on the planet -- by a wide
>>margin.
>
>
>Anything _alive_ yes :P  The issue of Marion is one yet undecided - and I'm not
>sure that Chinook could have beat him at his best, but we will never know that
>now though .. however, it is clear that Chinook is the best checkers "player"
>currently on the planet.  That being said, Chinook may be better than every
>other player, but it didn't demonstrate complete dominance - the top human
>players can still beat it once in a while :P
>
>Hmm, wait a minute.. we haven't asked the wombats.. :P
>
>
>Adrien.

Dr. Tinsley '94 and Chinook '94 were about equal.  It's tough to compare Dr.
Tinsley '57 and Chinook '00 though.

I don't know why you say that the top human players can still beat it once in a
while.  Please cite the game.  My understanding is that it hasn't lost a game
since the last time Tinsley beat it.  It has since clobbered both the reigning
human world checkers champion and the reigning human world correspondence
checkers champion.  We're talking +8 -0 =12 types of scores, and checkers is
much more drawish than chess.

Dave



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.