Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: The privilege of beacoming a beta-tester

Author: Eddie

Date: 10:31:56 09/05/00

Go up one level in this thread


On September 05, 2000 at 12:04:50, Enrique Irazoqui wrote:

>One day someone may write a book about the sociology of computer chess. Well,
>maybe the topic is not interesting enough for a book, but at least an article
>could be fascinating. A few paragraphs should relate to beta-testing and the
>relationship between CC freaks and programmers. Fernando: are you interested?
>
>Months ago, Uri posted that he expected to be paid for his collaboration with
>the development of chess programs. It made me smile, because beta-testing is
>supposed to be a privilege for the tester, although I never quite understood why
>it works this way. But it does. From one day to the next, a freak may be
>promoted to the "in" circle, improve his status to the imaginary rank of expert
>and get the ensuing ego-booster, but he has to pay a price. I have seen private
>emails from beta-testers published without permission when it was commercially
>convenient; beta-testers demoted as no-team members; beta-testers forced to
>write commercially useful stuff for the honor of spending X (when X tends to
>very many) hours hunting for bugs and checking the engine. Etc. It would seem a
>matter of common sense to assume, as Uri did, that collaborating in the
>improvement of a commercial product is a paid job, but in computer chess it is
>the other way round, even if the tester doesn't pay with money but in species.
>
>I have received over the years quite a few betas, but I always made clear that I
>would play with them for my own fun and in the way I was interested in, at my
>own whimsical pace, and that I was thoroughly incompetent as a tester (I am). A
>few times I declined, shame on me, the honor of beta-testing. Certainly the idea
>of getting paid for what in my case was a no-job didn't cross my mind, but the
>hierarchical relationship programmer-tester didn't either. Still, this kind of
>relationship seems to be quite common.
>
>Why would that be this way, why a person feels promoted and agrees to pay for
>the promotion. Strange, isn't it?
>
>Enrique

I think it would be an "honor" to be a tester for these great programs!  :))



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.