Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: SSDF rating list soon history?

Author: Enrique Irazoqui

Date: 05:17:50 05/09/98

Go up one level in this thread


On May 09, 1998 at 05:30:40, Thorsten Czub wrote:

>On May 09, 1998 at 01:12:28, Paul Petersson wrote:
>>I am really surprised that someone that says that he is interested in
>>the truth shows so little enthusiasm when a opportunity to settle this
>>suddenly appears. I would have expected the opposite.
>
>Words words and again words.

You prefer facts... :)))

>Don't forget that we all have autoplayer pairs here in germany too and
>that we have different results. You seem to believe that we spread
>whatever paranoid theories on the base of nothing.
>PLease understand that we do have the programs we talk about and we do
>have the auto232-autoplayer and we have played out manually games and
>our/or my results do not reproduce swedish results.
>
>The truth.
>As if this is a unique thing, outside, just to look at and it appears.
>We are many testers in germany and we have data.
>We don't know why our data does not reproduce the ssdf-results. We can
>only guess.

That's the problem, you see: guessing doesn't go very far. For instance,
you posted a 3-0 for CST against Nimzo98. I have a 15.5-3.5 in favor of
Nimzo98 against CST...

I can not reproduce your results by any stretch of imagination. The
meaning of this discrepancy is open to interpretation. For example,
different results happen all the time in computer chess. As you put it,
we can only guess...

Enrique



This page took 0.02 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.