Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Can Deep Fritz 7 find better moves than Deep Blue in 1997 ??

Author: Bruce Moreland

Date: 09:33:47 08/09/01

Go up one level in this thread


On August 09, 2001 at 07:12:11, Tanya Deborah wrote:

>
>
>Hi!
>
>Is really Deep Fritz running in 8 processors stronger that Deep Blue (97)???
>
>
>I hear that Deep Fritz 7 will see 5 millions nodes per second. It is enough to
>beat the World Champion???
>
>I think that if Deep Fritz could see 500 millions nodes per second, Kramnik will
>be dead.
>
>And why i find an article that said that Deep Fritz 7 recently beat Deep Blue,
>the same machine that beat Kasparov in 1997.  It is true?????  Where i can find
>the games??
>
>Thanks a lot!

Reporters seem to be like chess players, in a sense.  If you give them a
position that is recognizeable, they will see patterns and understand stuff and
make a sensible move.

If you set the board up randomly, they will look at it and not be able to handle
it, and won't make a good move.

When a reporter covers computer chess, all of them see a scrambled board.  And
since they are also under time pressure, their moves are all crap.

No, DeepFritz did not recently beat Deep Blue.

Fritz 4 (or maybe 3?) beat Deep Thought II in one game in 1995.  Old versions of
both, both running on wimped out hardware by today's standards.

It's intriguing bait for reporters, because the precursor machines really did
play.  But they can't get from that idea to something factual.

bruce

>Tanya D.



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.