Author: Shaun Graham
Date: 07:54:34 07/13/98
Go up one level in this thread
On July 13, 1998 at 10:26:24, Guido Schimmels wrote: > >On July 13, 1998 at 05:25:33, Shaun Graham wrote: >... >>Many I.M.s get the grandmaster title simply >>by playing in lots of tournaments in europe, if you are an I.M, and you play >>enough especially in lower category tourneys you will get the 3 GM norms. In >>the New york open there were several GMs in the under 2400 section, and >>even a couple rated under 2300!! So is Fritz a GM? >... > >(Caution, may be considered off-topic !) > >Yes, GM doesn't necessarily mean a thing today, the title has become >somewhat inflated. >There are roughly 500 GM's now. At least 400 too much IMHO ! >Or does anyone admire or only care about a player ranked 450 in the world >in tennis for example ? And chess is a very marginal competition (sport ?) ! > >Well, Fritz (or Rebel or ...) could easily pick those 3 GM norms if FIDE >would let them, (play hundreds of tournaments a year if necessary) ! > Thank you man of excellent reasoning ability! Yes fritz would get that norm, but i seriously doubt it would take hundreds of tourneys, my rough guess would be 50 max >I think a player should be rated >2600 for 2 or 3 years before he can be nope you need a rating of 2500, and you need to get the norms that's it. Also i believe that if you qaulify for the zonals you get the title automatically as Fischer did. You may also win the World Junior championship which qaulifies you for the title, but that may simply because you are automatically slotted into the zonals. >called a GM (remember, we once started with only 20 GM's !). I thought it was 10, named by, i believe czar Nicholas II but i could be wrong
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.