Author: Wayne Lowrance
Date: 08:48:09 11/09/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 09, 2002 at 04:48:36, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On November 09, 2002 at 01:08:35, Peter Kappler wrote: > >>On November 09, 2002 at 00:09:45, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >><snip> >> >>>I would expect that a match with your program would be tough. You have >>>repeatedly said that you copied most everything from my eval, and then >>>added some things on your own. >> >> >>If this is true, I find it extremely depressing. >> >>GCP, say it ain't so... > >Lol, it isn't. > >What I said was that when I saw a good idea in Crafty >that wasn't already in Sjeng, I would not hesitate to >'steal' it. > >I also said I know from looking at your code that there >aren't many things Crafty knows that Sjeng doesn't know, >but that the reverse isn't true. > >The above doesn't mean that I copied your eval and >added stuff of my own. > >-- >GCP What percentage of your eval is Dr Hyatt's in terms of performance contribution. Example you might say that only 10 % of the idea's are Dr Hyatts but that 10 % might equate to 50 % of the eval performance, or, the reverse could be the case. I think you need to clarify this for your own image ( if that is important to you). Let's not leave any doubt's about your program authenticity either way. My opinion only Thanks Wayne
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.