Author: Uri Blass
Date: 08:02:30 01/14/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 14, 2003 at 10:55:38, Andrew Williams wrote:
>On January 14, 2003 at 10:43:20, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>
>>{Game 494 (MoveiXX vs. ACCIDENTE) ACCIDENTE resigns} 1-0
>>Blitz rating adjustment: 2635 --> 2602
>>
>>Movei won a game and lost rating.
>>
>>Uri
>
>It seems a bit strange when moveixx has played a total of *thirteen* games to
>declare that the rating system is "meaningless". What you have observed only
>occurs in the first few games. I've forgotten now how many games it requires
>before it settles down.
It should never happen
I do not undertand what is the problem to decide never to reduce rating from a
side that won a game.
I am probably not going to have a special formula not to lose rating.
It is the job of the ICC to produce a rating that is not meaningless without a
special formula.
If they fail in this job I am not going to help them by special formula not to
play.
Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.