Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Rating in ICC is meaningless and here is an example

Author: Andrew Williams

Date: 07:55:38 01/14/03

On January 14, 2003 at 10:43:20, Uri Blass wrote:

>
>{Game 494 (MoveiXX vs. ACCIDENTE) ACCIDENTE resigns} 1-0
>Blitz rating adjustment: 2635 --> 2602
>
>Movei won a game and lost rating.
>
>Uri

It seems a bit strange when moveixx has played a total of *thirteen* games to
declare that the rating system is "meaningless". What you have observed only
occurs in the first few games. I've forgotten now how many games it requires
before it settles down.

If you want to argue in general that the rating system is meaningless, that is
reasonable. I don't believe that the phenomenon you have observed is an example
of the meaninglessness of the rating system.

Andrew

Re: Rating in ICC is meaningless and here is an example Miguel A. Ballicora 09:35:02 01/14/03
- Re: Rating in ICC is meaningless and here is an example Robert Hyatt 11:53:39 01/14/03
  - Re: Rating in ICC is meaningless and here is an example Miguel A. Ballicora 12:56:04 01/14/03
    - Re: Rating in ICC is meaningless and here is an example Robert Hyatt 13:28:03 01/14/03
      - Re: Rating in ICC is meaningless and here is an example Miguel A. Ballicora 15:09:35 01/14/03
        
        Re: Rating in ICC is meaningless and here is an example Robert Hyatt 15:25:39 01/14/03
        
        Re: Rating in ICC is meaningless and here is an example Miguel A. Ballicora 16:12:21 01/14/03
        
        Re: Rating in ICC is meaningless and here is an example Robert Hyatt 17:43:46 01/14/03
        
        Re: Rating in ICC is meaningless and here is an example Miguel A. Ballicora 07:48:12 01/15/03
        
        Re: Rating in ICC is meaningless and here is an example Robert Hyatt 08:30:56 01/15/03
        
        Re: Rating in ICC is meaningless and here is an example Richard Pijl 09:07:45 01/15/03
        
        Re: Rating in ICC is meaningless and here is an example Robert Hyatt 09:52:42 01/15/03
        
        Re: Rating in ICC is meaningless and here is an example Miguel A. Ballicora 10:03:16 01/15/03
        
        Re: Rating in ICC is meaningless and here is an example Robert Hyatt 12:25:41 01/15/03
        
        Re: Rating in ICC is meaningless and here is an example Miguel A. Ballicora 14:27:23 01/15/03
        
        Re: Rating in ICC is meaningless and here is an example Robert Hyatt 18:44:52 01/15/03
        
        Re: Rating in ICC is meaningless and here is an example Richard Pijl 14:21:11 01/15/03
        
        Re: Rating in ICC is meaningless and here is an example Richard Pijl 11:28:54 01/15/03
        
        Re: Rating in ICC is meaningless and here is an example Miguel A. Ballicora 09:17:15 01/15/03
        
        Re: Rating in ICC is meaningless and here is an example Uri Blass 16:47:21 01/14/03
        
        Re: Rating in ICC is meaningless and here is an example Robert Hyatt 17:47:46 01/14/03
        
        Re: Rating in ICC is meaningless and here is an example Miguel A. Ballicora 08:09:32 01/15/03
        
        Re: Rating in ICC is meaningless and here is an example Robert Hyatt 08:51:53 01/15/03
        
        Re: Rating in ICC is meaningless and here is an example Miguel A. Ballicora 09:33:05 01/15/03
        
        Re: Rating in ICC is meaningless and here is an example Robert Hyatt 09:58:36 01/15/03
        
        Re: Rating in ICC is meaningless and here is an example Uri Blass 09:20:14 01/15/03
        
        Re: Rating in ICC is meaningless and here is an example Robert Hyatt 10:00:32 01/15/03
        
        Re: Rating in ICC is meaningless and here is an example Uri Blass 13:43:16 01/15/03
        
        Re: Rating in ICC is meaningless and here is an example Robert Hyatt 18:48:44 01/15/03
Re: Rating in ICC is meaningless and here is an example Uri Blass 08:02:30 01/14/03
- Re: Rating in ICC is meaningless and here is an example David Rasmussen 10:02:21 01/14/03
  - Re: Rating in ICC is meaningless and here is an example Uri Blass 10:16:36 01/14/03
    - Re: Rating in ICC is meaningless and here is an example Jason Williamson 11:39:58 01/14/03
    - Re: Rating in ICC is meaningless and here is an example Ricardo Gibert 11:31:40 01/14/03
- Re: Rating in ICC is meaningless and here is an example pavel 08:14:09 01/14/03
  - Re: Rating in ICC is meaningless and here is an example Uri Blass 08:28:25 01/14/03
    - Re: Rating in ICC is meaningless and here is an example pavel 08:45:05 01/14/03
      - Re: Rating in ICC is meaningless and here is an example Uri Blass 08:55:34 01/14/03
        
        Re: Rating in ICC is meaningless and here is an example pavel 09:31:05 01/14/03
        
        Re: Rating in ICC is meaningless and here is an example Uri Blass 09:41:25 01/14/03
        
        Re: Rating in ICC is meaningless and here is an example Miguel A. Ballicora 09:40:05 01/14/03
        
        Re: Rating in ICC is meaningless and here is an example Daniel Clausen 09:43:05 01/14/03
        
        Re: Rating in ICC is meaningless and here is an example Miguel A. Ballicora 10:02:48 01/14/03

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.