Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 13:49:01 02/04/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 04, 2003 at 15:54:32, Andreas Guettinger wrote: >It can. With tactics, even weaker comps can beat GMs. See Kramnik and Kasparov. >Be careful, I studied many hours statistics at university. But you're right, it >is statistics. > >Your anti-comp strategy system IS a myth. I laugh always when I see this >argument. If one traines anti-computer, then he manages to get the computer to >look really silly in ONE game, but the 50 games he lost until he got this game >he never shows. Your anti-computer strategy is unsuitable for tournament play!! > > >But maybe you manage to win a 24 game tournament against a top program with your >anti-computer strategy? Show us! :) > >regards >Andreas Please say just a few words about the phenomenon that weak players could beat 2700 comps. Would you believe if I claimed the same for a match against human GM? I think that is the reason why we should discuss the whole question a bit deeper. Just anothother point. If you have studies stats you must know that your former sentence is wrong. That if I put the progs on 2400 I must also put the best humans on 2400. This is nonsense. Rolf Tueschen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.