Author: Peter Stayne
Date: 20:21:34 06/26/03
Go up one level in this thread
Ya like I said, hard to compare since our evals are very different. look at the node counts at each ply for one thing. the 11 second score I consider superfluous, since we don't have millisecond resolution. If Fritz rounds up, then that could be 11.0 or 11.999 seconds. or normal rounding could be 10.5 to 11.49999, which would give us sizable differences in kn/s. as we get into the >50 seconds, that difference becomes much less. Really, in either of our tests, there is no comparable point for a good comparison, since it's obvious both of ours are examining different lines to different depths of varying ease of evaluation on the cpu. Both of ours waver between the same numbers. You win price/performance by a long shot! (that is, if we're purely talking about chess :) ). Then again, we'll both be owned by the Opterons if early results are to be believed.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.