Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 16:52:18 07/06/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 06, 2004 at 19:44:57, Dan Honeycutt wrote: >On July 06, 2004 at 19:26:15, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >>On July 06, 2004 at 19:17:22, Dan Honeycutt wrote: >> >>>On July 06, 2004 at 18:51:03, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >>> >>>>On July 06, 2004 at 18:46:10, James T. Walker wrote: >>>> >>>>>On July 06, 2004 at 18:43:21, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On July 06, 2004 at 18:36:43, James T. Walker wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On July 06, 2004 at 18:15:53, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On July 06, 2004 at 18:06:06, Amir Ban wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On July 06, 2004 at 17:41:05, Dieter Buerssner wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Amir, congratulations for the nice game! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>I have not seen any info about the hardware beeing used by Junior at the current >>>>>>>>>>WCCC. Please tell it to the observers! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>With best regards, >>>>>>>>>>Dieter >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>It's an HP Proliant server. This is all HP is allowing me to say :( >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Amir >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>And this is allowed in accordance with the ICGA rules?? - Mhhhh. Strange. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Why not? Since there is no limit on hardware someone could show up with the >>>>>>>worlds fastest computer and it makes no difference. I would be interested in >>>>>>>the NPS Junior is hitting. While analyzing the game Diep-Junior I saw Junior 8 >>>>>>>hit over 1.6M nps on my XP2400. Bob says he is hitting 8M minimum! >>>>>>>Jim >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>So it would be possible that I am connected with the strongest computer in >>>>>>Japan, the second strongest was just bought by the university of >>>>>>BadenWürtemberg, and my fictive Rorybest is completely ok within the rules??? >>>>>>Fine! Thanks. >>>>> >>>>>If you can write a chess program to take advantage of it's speed I would surely >>>>>love to see it play chess. >>>> >>>>Ok, thanks, although I don't know exactly what this means or what it takes, at >>>>least I can understand that there is no automatical stronger output. Anyway it'a >>>>also a gambler motif I can see here. It's the typical trick we can expect, when >>>>Amir begins to play out his different personality joker in the last rounds - >>>>then you can no longer "prepare" or hope that your counter-tuning has success. >>>>Ok, all from a lay's heart. :) >>> >>> >>>So? More power to Amir. >>>Dan H. >> >>I didn't expect that I had to explain what fair play means in sports. It's that >>at least you know in advance what opponents you have. Or if one is a spider or a >>flying eagle. I mean, I must know how I must tune my own baby. If I have a >>chance to equalize the hardware or if I'm so far backwards that it could be >>better to remain in my observer's hut. >> >>Or the other way round: what can I win if I win on the base of my unknown >>hardware advantages? Or the claim of a possible advantage...? Even in boxing >>super heavy weight, where you can have a weight you prefer, everybody can see >>your body as soon as you appear in the ring. >> >>No, I don't buy that this here is fair. Also, that HP forbids to say must be a >>joke, because a company wants PR. > >No need to hurl insults Rolf. Why do you say such things? You think you can disqualify a foreigner? Sad thing to do. I didn't attack _you_! And I didn't "hurl" with my English. But don't expect further replies from my side. This is very insultive what you are doing. > We simply have difference of opinion - you seem >to think Amir's tactics are unsportsman like, Tactics? To keep secret your hardware is a tactic? >I think he should do whatever he >can, within the rules, to increase his program's chances. Fine. If that are the rules, so be it. So everybody should do the same. I can't see the advantage of such a sports event... > >Dan H.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.