Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Let's get the CCT ball rolling

Author: Will Singleton

Date: 09:15:44 11/24/04

Go up one level in this thread


On November 24, 2004 at 09:37:21, Anthony Cozzie wrote:

>On November 24, 2004 at 09:04:11, James Swafford wrote:
>
>>I've seen a couple of attempts to get some discussion started about
>>CCT, but AFAIK nothing's on the books yet.
>>
>>Anthony- did you ever get up with Volker?  He's fantastic at
>>organizing these things; I hope he's willing to do it again.
>>
>>Was a date /format ever decided on?  I'd like to play again this
>>year, but that depends on the date (I can't play the weekend of
>>the Jan 22nd/23rd).  Of course, majority rules...
>>
>>I think a lot of folks will want to start lobbying for their
>>favorite time control, but maybe we can start by agreeing on when
>>we can play:
>>
>>1. If you are interested in playing, what weekend(s) would
>>   work for you (or wouldn't work for you) in the Jan/Feb
>>   time frame?
>>
>>2. What are your thoughts on stretching the event out over
>>   two weekends?  Would you be less likely or unable to play?
>>
>>--
>>James
>
>I just got Volker's email from Ralf, and sent him an email not 5 minutes ago.  I
>agree he did an excellent job last year.  Anything in January _or_ February is
>fine with me; I have no social life worth talking about ;)
>
>I'd like to propse 60 2 as the timecontrol for CCT.  The problem with a large
>increment is that since we are playing with computers, there will always be *at
>least one* game that goes out to 150 moves.  So a 10 second increment will give
>the average game 60*10 = 10 minutes, while delaying the tournament 150*10 = 25
>minutes.  Therefore, I think keeping the increment small is a good idea, and if
>you screw up your time allocation, that is your problem.  At 60 2, we can pretty
>much guarantee all games will be finished in 60 + 60 + 4*150/60 = 2:10, which is
>about right IMO.
>
>I'd also like to point out (again) that I don't like tiebreak blitz games. :)
>
>anthony

With a 60 2 time control, you might get more than tiebreak blitz games. :)

45 10, with 9 rounds over one weekend, seems to have worked well for the last
two events.  CCT4 had 2 weekends at 60 10.  2 weekends makes it tough for some
folks to participate, and I think we ought to try to continue to make it as
accessible as we can.

So I would vote for keeping the same format as last year.  Late January or early
Feb is fine.

Will




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.