Author: Klaus Wlotzka
Date: 08:59:16 05/15/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 15, 2005 at 11:42:09, Uri Blass wrote: >On May 15, 2005 at 11:21:21, Klaus Wlotzka wrote: > >>If you haven't noticed it yet, Shredder 9 UCI doesn't play only in the >>CSS-computer rating list in another league. >> >>The difference of 100 Elo is relatively surely high. However, this lies well >>that "Shredder" likes short time controls. Furthermore "Shredder" copes with >>almost every opening system. Since there play at the CSS-computer rating list >>without books but with 10 modified SeE- positions, this yields broader >>advantages for "Shredder". >> >>Klaus Wlotzka > > >I think that this test is more interesting for me >I am more interested in testing that is done in that way and I hope that they >will test next version of Movei. > >I do not understand how they choose engines to test(for example I see Jonny2.64 >that did not aualify and I do not see Jonny2.75). > >Uri Hello Uri, a complete test run with an engine (480 games) lasts for always about 2 weeks. It can therefore last sometimes up to a year till it is a new version's turn again. So also at Jonny. I am testing "Spike 0.9a" at the moment, the following tests are planned after this: a.) Zappa 1.0 b.) Little Goliath Evolution I don't know whether Movei already plays so strongly to qualify for the CSS-computer rating list. I will look at the previous test reports more closely. Klaus
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.