Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 11:04:04 12/23/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 23, 2005 at 11:31:05, Keith Hyams wrote: >On December 23, 2005 at 05:36:12, Thomas Gaksch wrote: > >>Yes, I am GUILTY Rolf >> >>bye, bye Computer-Chess (Club) >One thing that you can learn from this is that feedback on this forum and, I >assume, most others, is unpredictable and, if referenced to a single day, >largely meaningless. About 2 weeks ago Vas, the author of Rybka, got a lot of >very uncomplimentary posts on this forum. I have reason to suspect that his >resilience is partly due to his realisation of the above. > >If your decision to leave is irreversible then I am sad and want to thank you >for your contribution. > Best regards > Keith What is really sad - that you dont support my vain attempt to tell the guy that he's NOT "guilty" IF he gives a bit news about his motives to cheat. Leaving with the exaggerated phrase "I'm guilty" has a childish factor and therefore shouldnt be used by adults. The point is that he doesnt feel guilty at all but he wants to imply that the community is so stubborn for not realising the very good of his false pretending. But morally he simply cant expect that all others congratulate him for a wonderful cheat. That would be a bit too much expected. But again, with a couple of explanations he could well reach his goal of receiving forgiveness. But NOT with such a dickhead... - In my view the pretending of having developped a new chess engine isnt honest. And for that reason he should make a couple of efforts to show that he has understood it. From his very aggressive response I conclude that he wont understand what was wrong with his behavior. :(
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.