Author: Ryan B.
Date: 14:16:43 02/12/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 12, 2006 at 13:32:33, Peter Skinner wrote: >This is nothing more than a flagrant attempt in polling users about possible >commercial payment possibilities for your program, and as such I am removing the >thread. > >As per the charter: > >Once a member gains access to the message board, he may read all messages and >post new or response messages with the proviso that these new or response >messages: > > 1. Are, within reason, on the topic of computer chess > 2. Are not abusive in nature > 3. Do not contain personal and/or libelous attacks on others > 4. Are not flagrant commercial exhortations > 5. Are not of questionable legal status. > >What about rule #4 do you not understand? > >Peter Thank you for standing up to the Rybka hype machine. I believe that you have nothing against Vas himself or Rybka and that you are simply making sure the charter is followed in hope that someday this forum will go back to what it once was. It is odd but I miss the days of Robert and Vincent arguing over pointless side issues. At least then we where learning more about computer chess from 2 of the best if the field. Now of there is a discussion about use of center pawn structure in eval no one is interested in the discussion, it is pushed off the first page in a day and there is only 1 non Rybka related thread on the first page by morning. Ironically by the book builder of Rybka (That is not bad, just funny to me. It was a very good post). I hope that at least a few other people here feel the same way I do. Ryan
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.