Author: stuart taylor
Date: 18:55:40 02/12/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 12, 2006 at 17:16:43, Ryan B. wrote: >On February 12, 2006 at 13:32:33, Peter Skinner wrote: > >>This is nothing more than a flagrant attempt in polling users about possible >>commercial payment possibilities for your program, and as such I am removing the >>thread. >> >>As per the charter: >> >>Once a member gains access to the message board, he may read all messages and >>post new or response messages with the proviso that these new or response >>messages: >> >> 1. Are, within reason, on the topic of computer chess >> 2. Are not abusive in nature >> 3. Do not contain personal and/or libelous attacks on others >> 4. Are not flagrant commercial exhortations >> 5. Are not of questionable legal status. >> >>What about rule #4 do you not understand? >> >>Peter > > >Thank you for standing up to the Rybka hype machine. I believe that you have >nothing against Vas himself or Rybka and that you are simply making sure the >charter is followed in hope that someday this forum will go back to what it once >was. It is odd but I miss the days of Robert and Vincent arguing over pointless >side issues. At least then we where learning more about computer chess from 2 >of the best if the field. Now of there is a discussion about use of center pawn >structure in eval no one is interested in the discussion, it is pushed off the >first page in a day and there is only 1 non Rybka related thread on the first >page by morning. Ironically by the book builder of Rybka (That is not bad, just >funny to me. It was a very good post). I hope that at least a few other people >here feel the same way I do. > >Ryan Yes, the good old days with all the sloshy mud slinging. Much more exciting! (Is that what you meant?) S.Taylor
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.