Author: Harald Faber
Date: 21:58:02 09/19/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 19, 1999 at 07:16:27, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On September 19, 1999 at 05:48:23, Harald Faber wrote: > >>>it remains what i said: as far as you use this autoplayer, your results >>>have NO value for me. >>>They are produced by a cheating device. > >>The only "proof" for this accusation is that your results are MUCH different >>than ALL OTHERS get, even without "cheating" autoplayer. > >It is not true that ALL other get different results. >When i remember it right is was you downloading a >broken version, testing them without tournament-time-controls >and only 3 minutes per move without permanent-brain. >of course if you give a program such a base, it can only disapoint you. >cstal is not designed for playing EXACT 3 minutes without >having pb. No program is! >and a broken version just made for programmers to study cstals >interface for multi-engine-usage is not made for testing-purposes. Then a hint on the homepage that this version is broken and not useful for playing would be very useful, right? BTW you alyways complained that everybody who got different and much worse results than you get used a broken version, if it was CST1 or whatever. >It is not all people getting worse results. All was exaggerating, but most. Only you and one or two others get convincing 2.5-1.5 results.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.