Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: The Scalable Search Test

Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto

Date: 04:14:20 06/18/00



Hi all

At the bottom of this post is a test position. The idea is not to check which
programs find the correct move (should be easy), but when the program first
spots it, with which score, when it fails high, how long it takes for the
fail-high to resolve and what score it gets back.

The idea is to see how well the programs handle this kind of positions where
the extensions suddenly can get wild, just when the alpha-beta window opens.
Some can handle this very well, other have the search totally blow up...

I've done a bit of testing already, and the results vary rather widely...so
I'd like to get as much data as possible on this one. If you are a programmer
yourself, _please_ indicate what extensions your program uses, or other
relevant info about your search. I'd like to get an idea of the do's/dont's
when extending.

Also, if anyone has other positions like this (preferrably even harder/worse),
please share them.

[D] rr4k1/pp2pp1p/q2p2p1/2pP3n/2P5/2BQP2R/PP3P2/2K4R w - - 0 19

PS. Is this a forced mate? If so, how many moves exactly?

--
GCP



This page took 0.02 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.