Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 05:33:04 11/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 14, 2000 at 07:56:08, Mogens Larsen wrote: >>no - it isn't. it is state of the art old paradigm. >This also means that Gambit Tiger is state of the art old paradigm, since it's >identical with Tiger 13.0 besides a few more or less advanced extensions and >parametric changes. no. you are wrong. did you program gambit-tiger ? >>does the new paradigm has to be stronger in results than the old paradigm ? >>don't you realize that it is christophes FIRST effort, version 1.0 ? >>RT is version 13 ! >When you consider that Gambit Tiger is built on the framework of Tiger 13.0 your >statement isn't correct. You can't derive anything from the version numbers. i see what is. you guess what is. thats the difference mogens. i really wonder why you always try to suggest you are scientific when none of your statements has anything to do with science or beeing accurate and in fact is pure gossip, cynical claims, offending jump on people. this is computerchess. and RT and GT are different programs and play different. they get different results. christophesn work on new paradigm has just begon. he will continue to do so. he said he has to overthink all (or most) he new about computerchess, because of the gambit-tiger experience. he also said he sees now parts of chris whittingtons comments in a different light. IMO thats one of christophes strength that he again and again reconsiders and readjusts his main values and ideas. as experience shows, christophe is at his best right directly after a championship. he seems to be a very good programmer IMO because he changes his ideas when he has found out by practise that they don't work. I have seen many other programmers almost NEVER change their main-ideas and just tuning arround until the whole program is that much overtuned that it plays fantasy-chess. christophe is different. he learns from mistakes and new insights. >Either they're non existant or very common. That depends on varying definitions >from week to week. Rare. you have maybe 30 programs, and 3 or 4 of them are maybe new paradigm. i would call this rare, especially since those 4 are not that often sold and only known in the freaks area.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.